![](https://catas.com/media/cache/app_news_image_view/uploads/media/sedie-ufficio.jpg)
For twenty years, the
UNI EN 1335-1:2000 standard has established the dimensional requirements for office chairs, dividing them into three types (A, B and C) according to their degree of adjustability and therefore adaptability to the size of the specific user, so as to allow compliance with the requirements of Legislative Decree 81/2008.
![](Nowadays for consumers it is difficult to make sense in the wide world of the product’s environmental performance label. Some claims on the market are not reliable, could be misleading and companies can give a false picture of their environmental impacts. This phenomenon is known as greenwashing. To counter this practice and protect consumers and environment the European Commission on March 2023 had published a proposal for a “Green Claim Directive”. The draft forces that all the environmental labels must be verified by a third part. The validation of the information inside will impede the publication of false content, improving the consumers’ protection ad trust. The European Commission is also working on a Directive that assure customers on their right to repair. Producers or importers must inform buyers on their obligation to repair after the period of warranty and give transparent information on the repair service through an accessible European module. Producers or importers could request the payment for the repair service and may also outsource this service. Finally, yet in 2022 the draft for a Regulation on Eco-design for sustainable products was published. With its coming in force, expected as for the other directives in 2027, only sustainable products will be introduced on the European market. Every products category will be regulated through Delegated Acts. The publication of the first package of Acts is waited in 2024 and furniture may be inside the products covered. The Delegated Acts will identify for each product category some sustainability requirements as: - The presence of substance of concern - The possibility of recycling of components - The use of energy - The environmental impacts Which must be respected for product’s commercialization. The product must have also a digital passport with information and technical characteristic, including traceability of the value chain. The responsibility will be of the manufacturer or, in case of extra Europe producer, of the importer or distributor. These tools will help to fulfill the European targets for the green transition. )
As is now known, from October 2020 the
UNI EN 1335-1:2000 standard has been replaced by the
new edition UNI EN 1335-1:2020 “Dimensional requirements for office chairs” in which the requirement for height adjustment of armrests was made more stringent.
But how did the modification in the adjustable armrests requirement change the strength test results?
We have often wondered this since the publication of the new version. For the type A office chair, in fact, there has been a change from the 50 mm of height travel required by EN 1335-1:2000 to the current 100 mm; armrests must also be adjustable in width (clear distance between the armrests).
As these changes could be expected to affect the resistance of the armrests to static load, since this test performed with the armrests adjusted to their maximum height and maximum width, we therefore would like to analyze all the static load tests on the armrests carried out in the two years prior the publication of the new standard (October 2018 / October 2020 - 30 September 2020) with the tests performed in the two years following the change (October 2020 / October 2022) and these are the results:
![](https://catas.com/uploads/media/graph-1-and-2.png?v3.4.3)
![](https://catas.com/uploads/media/graph-3-and-4.png?v3.4.3)
The choice of adjustable armrests instead of the fixed ones increased by 5 percentage points. This happen probably because, for type A seats, the armrests, if present, shall be adjustable.
Looking at the results, however, it can be noticed that the failed tests have slightly decreased (from 27.85% to 21.74%), even though he adjustment requirement of the armrests has doubled.
The numbers of tests analyzed are slightly different (109 total tests in the two-year period 2018/20 and 178 total tests in the two-year period 2020/22) and therefore we also wanted to verify the percentage of positive and negative results for the same number of samples.
From the graph it can be seen that the result between failed and passed tests is almost aligned in the two periods analyzed.
![](https://catas.com/uploads/media/comparison-positive-and-negative.png?v3.4.3)
Final considerations:
![](https://catas.com/uploads/media/ippo 1.png?v3.4.3)
At the time being, the number of breakages highlighted during the static load test on the armrests have aligned with the data detected before the change in requirement; great credit to the manufacturers of armrests, who have been able to make the right changes to obtain a positive result.
Per info: